Tuesday, January 31, 2017

‘Adversarial Journalist’ Fails to ‘Intercept’ Truth about Oath Keepers

And if Oath Keepers actually were a threat, what does it say about so many of us knowing about them while our “Homeland Security professionals” remained blisssfuly oblivious, awaiting SPLC agenda instructions? [More]
Apparatchiks parroting "progressive" lies gets tiresome-- especially when they're so readily exposed and they do it anyway.

[Via Bluesgal]

Pardon Me for Being Frivolous and Insensitive

Of course, Ted. [More]

What I won't forgive you for is being my enemy.  It's abundantly clear what you wish on him you wish on those who voted for him because of the issues he pledged to advance.

What is it with all these violence-minded "progressive" guitards?

[Via Jeet]

Church Conference Repeats Tired Talking Points to Advance Citizen Disarmament

As we see every time they offer an opinion, with “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day. In this case, perverse theologians would rather see those who would defend themselves with a firearm dead than armed. [More]
Funny, how the Church of the SJW basically exists to advance the types of politicians who revile traditional Christian teachings.

Memes of Bravado

Max Alexander springboards off a "lively discussion" held yesterday on my Facebook page to elaborate on the "unvarnished" points he made there. [More

In terms of my Oath Keepers article being "a moot point,"  I'd counter what is being illustrated are the insulated views of collectivist "pundits," and how the actions of those who heed them reflect a near-complete misunderstanding of those they purport to oppose. Anything that erodes the deterrent factor increases the likelihood of the ignorant doing something stupid, and that makes things dangerous.